Âé¶¹ÆÆ½â°æ

Skip to main content

Latest news

02
November
2026
|
08:00
Europe/London

When gardeners become filmmakers: how can films transform project evaluation?

This reflection is part of Ideas at Work, a series exploring the people and places shaped by humanities research at The University of Âé¶¹ÆÆ½â°æ.

Written by: Megan Whitlock
download
Overview
  • explored whether filmmaking can offer a more participatory approach to project evaluation
  • Three films were co-produced with garden volunteers from Platt Hall's
  • Led by , Senior lecture, Drama and Film, and , Head of the Department of Art History and Cultural Practices

Evaluation is embedded into many museum, gallery, and heritage workflows, often as a funding requirement or a way to monitor visitor experience. But when time and resources are stretched, it can too-often become a report relegated to the end of a project, functioning as a retrospective reflection rather than an ongoing tool for learning.

Our research asked whether filmmaking could offer another way: making evaluation more participatory and better equipped to capture the changes and relationships that are central to community-led projects.

Storyboarding the idea

The spark came in 2019, when we began working with Platt Hall during a period of major transformation. The former Gallery of Costume was being reimagined through the project to become a hyper-local community space that was not simply made for audiences, but developed with them.

At first, film was a way to document that transformation. Over time, however, the act of filming on site, conducting interviews, returning to the site, reviewing footage, and discussing choices created repeated moments of reflection. It helped people notice what was changing, both in the building and in their own relationship to the project.

This created a shift from filming a project, to exploring filmmaking as part of the project itself. The question became: what happens when people are not just subjects of evaluation, but active participants within it?

Why film

Filmmaking is a useful research method as it is, by nature, an inherently socially engaged and collaborative practice. Processes of storyboarding, directing, appearing on screen, speaking on camera and choosing what to cut or leave in all ask people to pause and reflect at each stage as the work unfolds.

This space for reflection was particularly important because Platt Hall’s redevelopment is rooted in centring local perspectives. The slow, intentional co-production process gave room for relationships to build, which could accentuate the emotional and social values of the project in ways that might exceed the written word.

From volunteer to director

Here we focus on our films with Platt’s Garden Project, launched in 2021, which transformed Platt Hall’s grounds from disused exterior space into a beautiful, community-led garden. Working collaboratively, gardening volunteers learned narrative techniques, directing and camera work, and how to shape a story through editing.

The resulting three films each offer a different perspective on the project and the people behind it:

  • A Tale of Healing, Inspiration & Biscuit Diversity in the Platt Hall Garden Project by Mary Collins explores her journey of growth through volunteering and how the garden helped her reconnect with others during personal struggles.
  • Compost by Rashid Mhar follows the lifecycle of compost, from decomposition to renewal, as a parallel to the transformation taking place at Platt Hall.
  • The Pleasure of the Work by Helen Steyne documents the before and after of the garden, and the community of volunteers who helped shape it.

Together, our work showcases why people take part in community-led projects, and how participation changes over time.

“

Being invited to stand in front of a camera and talk multiple times at different stages does refine your thinking. We can fill out surveys and we do questionnaires and we do reflective writing and the plethora of different evaluative techniques, [...] but there is something different about really being asked to talk and having that documented.

Dr Liz Mitchell, Platt Hall Lead
„

Doing research differently

Piloting these creative research methods ensures that evaluation doesn’t sit outside the project but becomes embedded; whilst the films are the outputs, the filmmaking process is where the learning can happen.

By working collaboratively, the pathway from research to real-world change is not linear, but cumulative. The research methods shaped the creative process; the creative process strengthened community participation; and those participant-led insights are now informing how heritage organisations think about evaluation, their spaces, and the cultural experiences of their audiences, as well as paving the way for these methods to be used in other contexts.

The impact

As the museum and heritage sector increasingly shifts to placing people at the heart of its work, co-production projects such as ours can demonstrate a more meaningful and effective approach to routine processes such as evaluation.

A city is made up of spaces such as Platt Hall. By capturing reflections, a sense of place, and shifts in relationships as they happen, we can understand how and why people participate in cultural and community spaces, as well as offer insights into how we can build cities that better serve the people who inhabit them.

You can view the three co-produced films here:

The full case study can be found here:

Share this page